THE MIND THAT RESIDES BEYOND BRAIN (Essay)

Read few basics of Panpsychism before you dwell into it. 

The following essay should be better understand as reference point for the interpretation of science (quantum mechanics and quantam entanglement) and spirituality ( conscious experience) 

THE MIND THAT RESIDES BEYOND BRAIN 

Because I am conscious therefore i cannot understand it , and so I  cannot make you understand it , but the comprehension of consciousness is not about understanding , or solving or even feeling it , it is about "Being" . A being is conscious , so you don`t have to feel something , because you are that , a table doesn`t have to feel like being a table , because it is a table.

you can only feel emotions that are changing because they are fleeting and are not permanent. Consciousness is permanent and is here to stay. consciousness doesn`t change , it evolves ,it transforms , it transforms to become more complex or sophisticated from being proto or binary . 

The hard problem of conscious experience( David Chalmers)  is that the experiences is not outward or inward , but it is transcedental and enlightening at times. the chaos of conscious experience is that it is extremely hard to put it in words and extremely effortless to discern it . The retrospection of the lunatic issues of mind beyond the brain can make you understand and comprehend life more , but this won't happen with consciousness because it is something , that one actually don`t need to understand or break down but need to look back at the hindsight and  nod at the uncanny nature of it .

 as when Meister Eckhart says that -" The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me." It translates to tell us that the eye is the medium that has a function , but when we get to the nuance of it , the function of eye is to see, and to see is what you cannot explain further until you see it , either you see something or you don`t. you cannot explain seeing to a blind man Without using an instance . For sure you can break down the process of seeing , But the process has more to it than "only seeing" It as a verb . One can definitely say that the eye with which I see God is the same with which the God sees me because it is a realm or another dimension , But the explanation of that dimension would never Be enough to get a hold onto the process unless one gets to unleash it themselves .

 The hard problem of consciousness Is no more hard  When we look at it And not decipher it .One Would be easily able to explain consciousness if they themselves are not conscious and are a non Transcendental being. But the problems become more complex when we try to guage That without consciousness you cannot even get a hold of anything in life let's not limit it to consciousness  only  . You cannot make someone understand what does awakening mean when they Themselves are sleeping but you can still communicate to them the exactness of it when you both are awake not by putting it in words but by the click of it or the shimmer of it. 

So we can say that the agency of life resides in the conscious experience of enjoying the process rather than the results that humans assigns to the impact biasness . If We would stop assigning subject and object  To examine consciousness we would coherently get that only intentful purpose  Is supreme  . The interpenetration of purpose and process in intentful pursuits Is the leap of faith that one needs to fortake so we become  What we intend to become  not By doubting but by Devoting .

Like the only difference between what is impossible and what is invincible Is daring to fall into the leap of faith , 

So that the faith catches you when you fall   And the labyrinth fling you in the place where you belong  .

अर्थात आत्मा और ब्रह्म में कोई फ़र्क नहीं है।

ब्रह्म ही सत्य है, सत्य ही ब्रह्म है|

Leeza